Y2Mate MP3 download apps on Google Play are all third-party builds. Search the store for that name and three listings come back with near-identical green icons, three unrelated developer accounts, and no link to the y2mate website that made anyone type the word.

One of those three carries the largest install base and has not shipped an update since September 2025. Its newest reviews are people reporting that the download step fails outright. The star rating sitting next to it was earned by an older build that no longer exists.
Read the developer line and the update date before you read the score.
Who publishes the Y2Mate MP3 download apps
Three separate developers publish them: Darren music, Good sound super, and Y2 Mate Yt MP3 Inc. Google Play shows no shared company between the three, and one listing openly disclaims any tie to the y2mate service.
That disclaimer sits at the bottom of the Y2mate music downloader description, in the developer’s own words: the app “has no official affiliation with third-party sites like y2mate, savefrom, or other similar services.” The same description opens by asking readers if they miss using y2mate, ytmp3, and savefrom in a browser. So the name pulls people in at the top of the listing and gets disowned at the bottom of it.
Nothing about this is unusual on Google Play, and nothing about it is illegal either. Borrowed branding is how a small developer gets discovered for a search term they could never rank for on merit.
It does mean the browser tool you may have used at y2mate.com and these three apps share a word and no code.
The store numbers, side by side
Ratings on Google Play average every review the listing has ever received, which lets a build that broke six months ago keep a score it earned two years ago. Reading the number alongside the review count and the update date changes what it tells you.

The 4.6 belongs to the smallest listing, roughly 10,000 installs against 55 reviews. A sample that size moves several tenths of a point on a dozen ratings, so treat it as a rough signal and not a verdict. The 100,000-install listing sits at 3.6 across 323 reviews, and its recent one-star entries are specific about what broke. One reviewer in June 2026 wrote that a YouTube short’s audio would not save and told people to skip the app unless they wanted to take a hammer to their phone. A May reviewer names the stage precisely, saying the process always dies at the conversion step.
The third listing, at 50,000 installs and 3.3 stars, has the freshest build of the group, updated in June 2026. Its review page splits hard between people who call it the best downloader they have found and people stuck on downloads that stopped working with no update available to fix them.
Are these apps safe to install?
All three declare no data collected and no data shared with third parties on their Google Play Data safety cards, and all three carry ads. Those cards are filled in by the developer, not audited by Google.
Google states the position plainly on every listing: the developer provided this information and may update it over time. The card is a declaration by the publisher about its own app. Google’s developer guidance is explicit that a publisher must reflect collection or sharing carried out by third-party code, including any advertising libraries and SDKs bundled into the app. An ad-supported free downloader bundles at least one of those. A card reading “no data collected” sitting beside a “contains ads” badge is a claim worth weighing, not a clearance.
The sideload route trades a different set of risks. The Y2Mate APK hosted on Uptodown publishes its specifications openly, which is more than the Play listings offer:
| Field | Value on the Uptodown listing |
|---|---|
| Version | 2.1.0 |
| Package name | com.y2mate_online |
| File size | 10.53 MB |
| Permissions requested | 9 |
| Downloads recorded | 123,045 |
| Distribution | Freemium, proprietary, contains ads |
Installing that file means switching on installs from unknown sources, which turns off a check your phone applies to everything else you install. The published SHA256 hash and certificate signature exist so you can confirm the file you got matches the file the site listed. Almost no one checks.
Four fields decide this for you faster than any review roundup:
- The developer name under the title. A handle with no company behind it leaves nobody to hold to a privacy policy.
- The update date. Android and YouTube both shift constantly; a build frozen for ten months is a build that has stopped keeping up.
- The newest one-star reviews. Sort by most recent. Old five-star ratings describe software that has since been replaced.
- The permission list against the job. Storage access fits a downloader. Requests reaching contacts, SMS, or accessibility services do not.
Community advice lands in the same place, with a warning about paid forks:
“yes, GrayJay and it’s free, if you ever find a version or fork of it that says you need to pay, it is most likely fake and riddled with malware”
– r/ApksApps, July 2026 (4 upvotes)
Where the legal line sits
YouTube’s terms restrict users from any attempt to “access, reproduce, download, distribute” content outside what the service authorises or what a rights holder permits in writing. That clause appears in the YouTube Terms of Service under permissions and restrictions, and it applies to you regardless of which tool performs the download.
Two of the three listings answer this by claiming their catalogue is Creative Commons licensed. YouTube does let an uploader attach a CC BY licence to a video, though the setting is opt-in and an uploader can only apply it where they hold the rights to every element of the recording. A commercially released track sitting on a label’s channel fails that test, so the claim covers a corner of the platform and not the songs most people go looking for.
Your own recordings, audio in the public domain, and clips an uploader has genuinely released under CC sit on the safe side of that line.
What people use when these apps fail
Threads on r/androidapps read like a graveyard of downloaders that worked until they suddenly did not. The recurring recommendations are open-source projects that update quickly when YouTube changes something:
“YTDLnis(best for downloading from YT) or Seal”
– r/androidapps, December 2025 (5 upvotes)
Those come from outside the Play Store, so they inherit every sideloading caveat above, and the same thread has users reporting that Y Music, 4K, Seal, and TubeMate had all stopped working for them. The upside of an open-source downloader is repair speed, since a breakage gets patched in public within days.
The sanctioned route is YouTube Premium’s offline saving, which keeps tracks inside the YouTube and YouTube Music apps and never hands you a loose MP3 file. That restriction is the point of it: the label gets paid, the file stays managed, and no unknown-sources toggle gets touched. If what you want is a portable file to move onto an SD card or a car stereo, Premium will not give you one, and buying the track from a store that sells downloads will.
For a personal library you keep for years, purchased files also survive the app that fetched them.
Frequently asked questions
Is there an official Y2Mate app on Google Play?
No listing on Google Play is published by the y2mate website. The three apps ranking for the name belong to Darren music, Good sound super, and Y2 Mate Yt MP3 Inc., with no company link shown between them.
Can I get Y2Mate MP3 download apps from APKPure or another APK site?
Yes, and mirrors like Uptodown and APKPure list the file openly, but installing from them requires enabling unknown sources on your phone. That setting stays on afterwards and applies to every later install unless you switch it back. Mirrors also publish a SHA256 hash for the file, which is the only way to confirm the APK you received matches the one the site vetted.
Why does a Y2Mate converter app stop working on YouTube links?
YouTube changes how its streams are served, and a downloader has to be rebuilt each time to follow. Apps left without an update for months break at the conversion stage, which matches the failure described in the recent one-star reviews on the 100,000-install listing.
Of everything printed on a store listing, the update date is the one field marketing cannot dress up. Check it, open last month’s complaints, and the choice between three apps wearing the same name usually makes itself.





